The Vegan Shoe Lady

The co-owner of Southern California’s premier vegan shoe store talks about style, veganism, animals, the planet, and ethics.

I Heart Jenette Bras June 16, 2009

Filed under: Dispatches from the shop — veganshoelady @ 12:47 pm
Tags: ,

On Saturday, I finally got around to making the trek up to Jenette Bras in East Hollywood.

I had misgivings about the area – it was unfamiliar territory (West Hollywood is another story), and the last time I’d parked my Volvo in the vicinity of Melrose, it had been stolen within minutes (I was very, very lucky to get it back).

But, there happened to be an available parking space right outside the door when I pulled up, so I took a deep breath, set the Club, double-checked the door locks, and went inside.

If you’ve just begun reading my blog, Jenette Bras is a brand-new bra shop exclusively for well-endowed women (D through K cups), and I’ve always been top-heavy. As a result, I’ve always hated bra shopping.

Not anymore.

The shop is itty-bitty (I used to think my store was small!), but pristine, and with a very pleasant atmosphere. The staff are the most friendly, helpful, and attentive I’ve ever encountered when bra shopping, and the selection is the best I’ve ever found in a brick-and-mortar store.

And, best of all, in addition to everyday bras, they carry beautiful bras reminiscent of 1950s pinup queens (though the shaping is, thankfully, not as torpedo-like)…some with matching panties. Not much in red (yet), but I bought some truly divine things in pink and black. Usually, sexy bras for busty women are on the sleazy side, so it was nice to try on something tasteful for a change! (They also have slips, chemises, camisoles, and bridal underthings – swimwear is coming soon.)

Oh, and the staff actually take the time to fit you properly. After years and years of being measured again and again by salesgirls at certain mall stores which shall remain nameless and having them insist each time that I was a 36DD, it’s official – I’m a 36F to FF, depending on the manufacturer. Yikes.

From now on, Jenette is my bra source. Fellow busty gals, go there NOW.

 

Yet Another Infrequent Internet Roundup May 21, 2009

Some guy in Washington state, when told he could not use a lighting store’s restroom, proceeded to trash the place. I’m suddenly very glad my shop doesn’t have its own lavatory, even though locking up to dash off to the public restroom is not an easy thing to do on busy days.

Luxury goods conglomerate LVMH, one of the largest in the world, has purchased a minority share in fair-trade apparel brand Edun. Oh dear. Co-founder Bono points out that LVMH has the funds and the power to help the brand grow, therefore creating more sustainable jobs in the developing nations where their apparel is produced. He’s absolutely right about that, of course, but if it were my company I’d be worried about LVMH trying to meddle in how the business was run. Their chairman, Bernard Arnault, says LVMH shares Edun’s vision and values, and I’d like to believe him, but there’s a reason Arnault was dubbed “the wolf in cashmere” by the press. (Read Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster by Dana Thomas for further info on Arnault and LVMH.)

The LA Times reports that Southern California’s busty ladies FINALLY have a bra shop that caters to us – Jenette Bras in East Hollywood. The store carries D through K cups, and some of the bras on their website are actually pretty. I haven’t yet made the trek up to the store, but I will definitely be going soon.

 

Sometimes it Just Doesn’t Pay to be Busty May 7, 2009

Filed under: Dispatches from the shop — veganshoelady @ 4:49 pm
Tags: , , ,

It seems that British retailer Marks & Spencer, commonly shortened to M&S, charges extra for larger bras.

Which, not surprisingly, has really ticked off a lot of busty women.

M&S charges two pounds extra for bras over a DD cup, claiming it covers the cost of extra materials, wider straps, and better support. Regardless, it is still size discrimination.

I don’t sell bras, I sell (mostly) shoes. NONE of my suppliers charge extra for larger-than-average shoe sizes; that would be unethical. We can’t choose our shoe size (to a point – we can consciously avoid certain activities and unstructured footwear that cause the feet to spread, but that’s another subject for another day). And most women sure as hell don’t choose their bra size.

I’ve been cursed with a pair of 36DDs. Did I choose my bra size? No. And if given the choice I certainly would not have chosen anything bigger than a C cup.

Being busty is, frankly, a pain in the ass. And, for that matter, a pain in the back, a pain in the neck, and occasionally a pain in the chest, too.

I haven’t been able to stand up perfectly straight since age 12. I have suffered from chronic back pain (which, ironically, was mostly alleviated when I started wearing high heels) since age 15. If I want to buy a dress off the rack, I have to buy a size 12 (and occasionally a 14) even though the rest of my body can usually fit a 10. God help me if I want to buy a cute top; most of them look too skimpy for my figure. (Yes, I know how to sew…but I’m really, really tired of having to make all my own clothes.) Don’t get me started on how poorly-raised males (and the occasional jealous female) respond to large breasts.

The absolute worst part of being busty is bra shopping. I HATE BRA SHOPPING. It’s worse than swimsuit shopping. Lots of brick-and-mortar lingerie stores refuse to carry anything bigger than a C cup. Some of them will sell larger cup sizes online, and there are specialty retailers on the internet, but most busty women (myself included) resent not being able to try on a bra before buying it – and then being forced to pay for shipping, too.

Even if we find a bra that seems to be the correct size, most of the bigger ones are hideous. They look like white poly-blend torture devices for the chest! (For a rough idea of what the average bra over a C cup looks like, watch the “German Week” episode of “Are You Being Served?” and watch for Mrs. Slocombe and Miss Brahms unpacking the “bustenhalters.”) And, honestly, a lot of them feel like torture devices, too. The full-coverage ones are the worst offenders – ugly, heavy, uncomfortable, and especially unpleasant for busty women who aren’t big all over. Every time I try one on, the sides come up so high the underwires jab my armpits if I try to move.

To make matters worse, full-coverage large bras can cover a little TOO much skin, meaning we can’t even wear relatively modest boatneck tops without our bras peeking out. This is problematic not only because we have a hard enough time finding tops that fit, but also because when a larger chest is too covered-up, it makes the unlucky lady appear much heavier than she actually is. Just what we need – MORE bulk.

(Speaking of added bulk, can I just say that I really hate padded straps? They create little bumps in the shoulder line of every top – like we don’t have enough fit issues – and never stopped me from getting half-inch-deep bra-strap grooves in my shoulders.)

Of course, if we manage to find a sexy bra in our size that actually fits, it’s often just a scaled-up version of a bra designed for a B cup. The fact of the matter is, we do need *some* extra support, especially in the back. A skimpy thing with only two hooks might cut it in the boudoir if it isn’t going to be worn for long, but it’s not very practical for daily wear.

And seriously, what’s up with the recent dearth of colorful bras over a D cup? I was searching online for new bras the other day and was shocked to find that even biggerbras.com seems to be sticking with boring neutrals. Sure, every woman needs one good basic black bra (even me), but what’s up with all the white, brown, and beige? Do bra manufacturers (and retailers) suddenly think busty women don’t have any ’special friends’ who might appreciate seeing us in something pretty? (Although I myself am in a long-distance relationship and thus have few opportunities to flaunt what I’ve got, I prefer my underthings fire-engine-red, thank you very much.)

The bottom line is, it’s hard enough being a well-endowed lady. One would think that a British retailer such as M&S would “play fair” (fair play being of relatively high importance in British culture) and charge the same amount for a larger bra as they would for a smaller one.

Since M&S’s pricing discrepancy only affects bras over a DD cup, I myself would not have to pay extra for a M&S bra in my size, but that doesn’t mean I don’t find it grossly unfair. To Beckie Williams, the young woman who has taken action against M&S, I’d just like to say good luck.

P.S. Yes, I’ve considered getting a reduction. In fact, I BEGGED my parents to let me get a reduction when I was in high school. Even though I was in considerable pain most days, they thought I was too young, and their insurance refused to pay for the surgery. I could get one now if I came up with several thousand dollars, but it won’t reverse the damage to my spine, which was kind of the whole point.

P.P.S. I also looked into making my own bras. But, it’s difficult to find underwires and soft cups over a C cup, and then I’d have to fit it on myself, too. Ever try fitting something on yourself? It’s very difficult to do alone, especially with bras, since moving the arms to pin the material can make it too loose or too tight – and there’s also a high risk of sticking oneself with a straight pin. Ouch.

 

Filling Unmet Needs March 13, 2009

In the summer of 2003, I was working as an assistant resident manager at my alma mater (I’d looked for jobs in the fashion industry, of course, but at the time even my most talented classmates had trouble getting interviews due to the economy). On the way back from a lunch break, I bounded through the lobby of the dorm building where I lived, wearing a cheerful cherry-print dress of my own design.

A woman from the Admissions office, who was escorting an applicant, stopped me and asked “Why do you not have your own line?”

“I don’t have any financial backing or startup capital,” I explained, “but someday I’ll do it.”

Nearly six years later, I’m still hoping to someday launch my own line.

Believe it or not, I didn’t decide to go into fashion because it’s one of the family specialties (my extended family actually has more teachers than style mavens). I did so out of sheer frustration.

In this entry, I mentioned my own curvaceous figure. As it was a bit beyond the main subject of the entry, I didn’t go into detail about how difficult it is to shop for clothes when you’re built like I am.

I’m five feet, six inches tall (without the heels). My measurements are 40-30-38, and I wear a 36DD bra. With a little persistence, I can usually find skirts and pants that fit, but I can’t buy pants on short notice because they’re ALWAYS four to eight inches too long (I have stunted shins), requiring me to hem them (what happened to the days when pants had petite, regular, and tall inseams?). I can’t wear most jumpsuits or one-piece swimsuits because of my freakishly long torso (I had to extend my tailored jacket pattern by a whopping FOUR inches at the waist so the finished jacket would actually reach my hips – until my professor saw the mockup on me, she was convinced I’d made it way too long). Tight waists are a no-no (I also have extra ribs). It’s damn near impossible to find tops that fit my ample chest without being horribly skanky or unforgivably frumpy – and if I can, I’m VERY lucky if they are long enough to cover my midriff. Dresses, especially short ones, are even harder to find (especially since I prefer dresses that can also hide the ugly discolored scar on my left knee). Regular misses’ sizes often don’t fit at all, yet true plus-size apparel is MUCH too big on me (everywhere except my chest, anyway).

In short, trying to dress myself off-the-rack is a royal pain in the arse.

If you have ever been moved to tears by the hell of trying on bathing suits while a few pounds overweight, imagine feeling that way EVERY time you are in a fitting room. After one particularly traumatic shopping experience (in which only ONE item in an entire shopping mall came ANYWHERE close to fitting – and it looked AWFUL on me), I added classes in sewing and patternmaking to my college course schedule. If the local stores weren’t willing to carry things I could actually wear, I could still dress well (and send a very clear “screw you” message) by making my own clothes.

After my sewing teacher was completely floored by my insanely complicated, handmade Sally costume (including a handmade yarn wig), I realized I was actually pretty good at it, and a year later I was majoring in Fashion Design at another school, with hopes of one day bringing high style to the curvy masses.

Nowadays, I’m bringing stylish vegan shoes, bags, and other apparel to veggie-friendly Southern California, but there is a much more neglected market out there. One that grows in number by the day, is not going to go away, and is being ignored by snobby, sexist, fat-phobic designers.

I am referring, of course, to women who aren’t rail thin.

I didn’t say “plus size” because one needn’t be a size 14 to be sneered at by anorexic boutique employees and encounter stores that refuse to carry anything above a size 6 (no, I’m not kidding). This is especially true in SoCal.

Recently, the plight of the size 8-and-up woman has been chronicled by the LA Times, primarily by the All The Rage blog. In this entry, blogger Monica Corcoran starts with the ruthless attitude toward non-sylphs prevalent in the LA area. In part:

A friend of mine once walked into Fred Segal and asked for a dress in a size 8 and the slip of a saleswoman smiled sadly and said: “Sorry. We don’t carry a lot of large.” Large? If a size 8 is considered a large here, imagine how a size 14 must feel.

That entry was soon followed by a great article from Emili Vesilind: Fashion’s Invisible Woman. Vesilind points out that the fashion industry is far more forgiving of larger men than of larger women, but goes into far greater detail about the industry’s widespread delusion that women over a size 6, who make up the majority of the American women’s apparel market, either don’t exist or are unworthy of wearing the same fabulous ensembles as their size 2 friends. Here’s a very telling passage:

Fashion-forward boutiques such as Maxfield and Fred Segal rarely stock anything over a size 10, and in designer shops, sizes beyond 6 or 8 are often hidden like contraband in the “back.” Department stores typically offer tiny sections with only 20 or so brands that fit sizes 14 and up — compared with the 900-plus brands they carry in their regular women’s wear departments.

That leaves style-loving full-figured women with a clutch of plus-size chains including Lane Bryant, Fashion Bug, Avenue and Torrid. Or big-box stores such as Target, Kohl’s and Wal-Mart, the No. 1 seller of plus-size apparel in the country — though most of its selection consists of basic, often matronly items. Beyond this, plus-size clothing is largely relegated to the Internet, where customers who already have a complicated relationship with clothes are unable to see, touch or try on merchandise.

(As a fashion-loving curvy woman, I have to say: big box stores?! Seriously? I’ve seen the offerings at big box stores – lots of polyester, often-unflattering cuts, and lackluster quality indicative of a likely sweatshop origin. I’d rather go naked than shop at Wal-Mart.)

With more Americans getting bigger and bigger, it makes sense to provide stylish apparel that they can actually wear, instead of jealously gazing at in the pages of a glossy magazine. In fact, that article touched a chord with many LA Times readers. Yet, the industry still doesn’t want to wake up and pay attention.

Those of us who love clothes but have a hard time finding things that fit have money to burn, since we so rarely get to spend it. When we find things that fit and flatter, many of us don’t even look at the price tag before snatching it up (before money became tight for yours truly, I NEVER, EVER cared how much a perfectly-fitting garment cost). Many of us would happily abandon frumpy/dumpy “plus size” stores forever if stylish stores and designer boutiques carried that cute dress in the window in size 16 as well as size 0. Making real-person sizes readily available wouldn’t just be far more kind to curvy women, it could very well give the economy a well-needed boost. Case in point:

I’m a 14 (albeit working on returning to former 10-12 size), willing and able to spend money on fashion, and there’s nothing to buy.


The first national designer/retailer combo brave enough to make and stock real fashion sized for the average American woman is going to make a fortune, and then hopefully the rest will begin to follow.

- Arlene Wszalek, Sherman Oaks (the Shoe Lady’s hometown!)

I’d have launched my own label right after opening the store, were it not for the fact that starting a clothing company is VERY, VERY EXPENSIVE – much more so than opening the store (which certainly was not cheap, either). It’s true that Calvin Klein started with $10,000, but that was in 1967. Today, he’d probably need at least half a million dollars. One brilliant designer I know privately mentioned that she’d saved money for her entire adult life so she could afford to start her own company.

Would anyone out there like to invest in a stylish, curve-friendly, all-vegan startup clothing label? Anyone? I’ll give you clothes and even custom-fit them myself…I promise to use healthy, smiling models in every color of the rainbow for all my ads and shows…I’ll have everything manufactured in America or in fair-trade factories abroad…I’ll even give your fashion-mad niece an internship. I want to help my lushly-figured sisters, but I can’t do it alone.

P.S. Incidentally, there are eco-friendly labels out there that are apparently just as fat-phobic as Chanel, Prada, etc. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve received line sheets from green designers who aren’t making anything bigger than a size 8, as if larger women couldn’t possibly be eco-chic! While it can be fiscally sensible to start with a few sizes and add more as a company expands – as some footwear companies have done – green labels are doing no favors for themselves or the market by not starting with a size range more representative of today’s customer – say, sizes 6 to 16 instead of 0 to 10. One would think that all Earth-conscious companies would also be socially conscious.